//Just add your questions and remarks on the bottom of the page.//

This meeting is meant to discuss the latest developments in and around OpenSER.

It will be held on friday the 20-04-2007 at 13:00 GMT ([[http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html|Time converter]]) in the #openser channel on irc.freenode.net.

====== Agenda ======

===== Experiences with OpenSER 1.2 =====
  * one month after the release
  * problems?
  * any annoyances?
  * migration plans

===== OpenSER project =====
* hosting for the web/ftp/deb site (server, migration, admin)
* are we happy with SF? alternatives
* compile farm options? SF does not provide this service anymore 

===== State of OpenSER Documentation =====
  * for developers
  * doxygen code documentation
  * starting guide for users


===== RTPProxy =====
* some patches are on our tracker (miconda attempted to contract RTPProxy developer, but no feedback so far, should re-attempt)
* some expressed on IRC and mailing lists intention to enhace RTPProxy (transcoding, accounting, ...)
* decision to be taken: how to proceed?

===== Next release =====
  * major release in six months?
  * Roadmap?
  * features currently in development
  * minor releases?
  * how to handle p2psip ?


===== Q&A Section =====

^ Your name      ^  Question          ^
| SebastienTricaud | What do you think of having several libraries handling specific OpenSER related operations. Such as libopenserbase for handling basic operations (memory etc..) or libsipparser for parsing sip only ? Thus other projects could use it instead of having to reinvent the wheel. I am in this situation where I use OpenSER SIP parser only that I libified for custom purposes. |
| Cesc Santa | I think this would be great, but it requires quite some re-write, I think. But modularization would go a long way, making it easier to understand the codebase and get new people and projects on board. |
| SebastienTricaud | Since I am very interested by this, I would like to propose several patches to go in that direction. First of all I'd like to know whether it would be accepted or not (not its quality, its goal) |
| Henning | we can talk later on this, as part of the openser roadmap discussion there should be time for your question. |
| SebastienTricaud | Sure, do you know when this will happen ? |
| ... | ... |