This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
devel:libcurl_integration [2016/01/28 20:55] hugh.waite [Requirements] |
devel:libcurl_integration [2016/02/03 11:04] (current) oej [Discussion] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
The final solution will be a combination of these, however consensus should be reached on the architecture. | The final solution will be a combination of these, however consensus should be reached on the architecture. | ||
Should these be combined into a single module, or should one depend on the other? | Should these be combined into a single module, or should one depend on the other? | ||
- | It should of course be easy to understand | + | It should of course be easy to understand |
+ | |||
+ | Items to discuss: | ||
+ | * Name of modules(s) | ||
+ | * Definition of API functions and parameters | ||
+ | * Use of worker pools | ||
+ | |||
+ | Names | ||
+ | * The curl module has been renamed to " | ||
+ | * Need new name for the new module | ||
Please add your own comments below (hpw) | Please add your own comments below (hpw) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * (gv) I think it was mentioned at the meeting in Brussels: it would be nice to have a separate configuration file with the " | ||
+ | * (oej) The " |