User Tools
kemi:performance-tests:5.2.x
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
kemi:performance-tests:5.2.x [2018/12/06 09:37] miconda |
kemi:performance-tests:5.2.x [2019/01/07 09:05] (current) miconda [Remarks] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
| test8; | test8; | ||
| test9; | test9; | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | These users have to be added to Kamailio subscriber table. To add them from the source code tree of Kamailio: | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | cd utils/ | ||
| + | DBENGINE=MYSQL ./kamdbctl create | ||
| + | DBENGINE=MYSQL ./kamctl add test0@127.0.0.1 test0 | ||
| + | DBENGINE=MYSQL ./kamctl add test1@127.0.0.1 test1 | ||
| + | DBENGINE=MYSQL ./kamctl add test2@127.0.0.1 test2 | ||
| + | DBENGINE=MYSQL ./kamctl add test3@127.0.0.1 test3 | ||
| + | DBENGINE=MYSQL ./kamctl add test4@127.0.0.1 test4 | ||
| + | DBENGINE=MYSQL ./kamctl add test5@127.0.0.1 test5 | ||
| + | DBENGINE=MYSQL ./kamctl add test6@127.0.0.1 test6 | ||
| + | DBENGINE=MYSQL ./kamctl add test7@127.0.0.1 test7 | ||
| + | DBENGINE=MYSQL ./kamctl add test8@127.0.0.1 test8 | ||
| + | DBENGINE=MYSQL ./kamctl add test9@127.0.0.1 test9 | ||
| + | DBENGINE=MYSQL ./kamctl db show subscriber | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| ===== SIPP Testing Command ===== | ===== SIPP Testing Command ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | SIPP was run on the same system with Kamailio. The command is: | ||
| < | < | ||
| Line 487: | Line 507: | ||
| #!ifdef WITH_CFGPYTHON | #!ifdef WITH_CFGPYTHON | ||
| - | modparam(" | + | modparam(" |
| cfgengine " | cfgengine " | ||
| #!else | #!else | ||
| Line 498: | Line 518: | ||
| #!ifdef WITH_CFGJSDT | #!ifdef WITH_CFGJSDT | ||
| - | modparam(" | + | modparam(" |
| cfgengine " | cfgengine " | ||
| #!else | #!else | ||
| #!ifdef WITH_CFGSQLANG | #!ifdef WITH_CFGSQLANG | ||
| - | modparam(" | + | modparam(" |
| cfgengine " | cfgengine " | ||
| #!else | #!else | ||
| Line 991: | Line 1011: | ||
| function ksr_route_reqinit() | function ksr_route_reqinit() | ||
| if not KSR.is_myself_srcip() then | if not KSR.is_myself_srcip() then | ||
| - | if not KSR.htable.sht_has_name(" | + | if KSR.htable.sht_has_name(" |
| -- ip is already blocked | -- ip is already blocked | ||
| KSR.dbg(" | KSR.dbg(" | ||
| Line 1004: | Line 1024: | ||
| end | end | ||
| end | end | ||
| - | if KSR.corex.has_user_agent() then | + | if KSR.corex.has_user_agent() |
| if string.find(K_ua, | if string.find(K_ua, | ||
| or string.find(K_ua, | or string.find(K_ua, | ||
| Line 1415: | Line 1435: | ||
| return -255; | return -255; | ||
| - | if KSR.corex.has_user_agent() : | + | if KSR.corex.has_user_agent() |
| ua = KSR.pv.gete(" | ua = KSR.pv.gete(" | ||
| if (ua.find(" | if (ua.find(" | ||
| Line 1662: | Line 1682: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | Executed when running with Lua scripting language: | + | Executed when running with Python |
| < | < | ||
| Line 1853: | Line 1873: | ||
| ===== Remarks ===== | ===== Remarks ===== | ||
| - | Mentioning it again, the target of the tests was not to measure the capacity of Kamailio processing, but how the execution time differs in more or less same conditions between native scripting configuration file and KEMI alternatives, | + | Mentioning it again, the target of the tests was not to measure the capacity of Kamailio processing, but how the execution time differs in more or less same conditions between native scripting configuration file and KEMI alternatives, |
| - | Testing was done on the same system, running first the test with native configuration file and immediately after, the one for Lua scripting. | + | Testing was done on the same system, running first the test with native configuration file and immediately after, the one for Lua or Python |
| It was observed that the execution of native scripting routing blocks and Lua scripting functions takes more or less same time. Sometimes is native scripting slightly faster, other times is Lua scripting slightly faster. The average (for both native and Lua scripts) is in the range of 60 to 80 microseconds ( 1 / 1 000 000 of a second) for processing the registration request. The minimum reflects more what it takes for the first REGISTER request without authorization header, which is quickly challenged with 401 response. The maximum reflect the processing of the REGISTER request with valid authorization header, which does a query to database to fetch the password as well as store/ | It was observed that the execution of native scripting routing blocks and Lua scripting functions takes more or less same time. Sometimes is native scripting slightly faster, other times is Lua scripting slightly faster. The average (for both native and Lua scripts) is in the range of 60 to 80 microseconds ( 1 / 1 000 000 of a second) for processing the registration request. The minimum reflects more what it takes for the first REGISTER request without authorization header, which is quickly challenged with 401 response. The maximum reflect the processing of the REGISTER request with valid authorization header, which does a query to database to fetch the password as well as store/ | ||
kemi/performance-tests/5.2.x.1544085475.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2018/12/06 09:37 by miconda
Page Tools
